
Fakers, Takers, Bakers and Makers
Subject: Success, Motivation, Motivational
By Victor Antonio
I
read a book by Carl Jung many years ago called,
“Man and His Symbols”. It’s a socio-psychological analysis on who and what
makes up our society. One of Jung’s terms that stuck with me was the word
Archetypes.
Did you ever meet someone and within minutes you
have a good sense of the person? Jung says if you do, you have categorized that
person under some archetype you have stored in your memory.
For
example, if every salesperson you meet uses a ton of grease in their hair, wears
polka dotted suits, talks at the speed of light and proves themselves to be
untrustworthy over and over again, it’s a sure bet that anyone fitting that
description in the future will be categorized as untrustworthy. By Jung’s
definition, the very description of the person is an archetype you use to
determine if someone is trustworthy or not. It’s a shortcut to processing and
cataloging our human relationships. Over time, we develop an internal database
of archetypes (categories for people) so that when we meet someone for the first
time, we get this sense of who they are based on our past experiences with
others.
In the world of sales and business in general I
believe there are four broad categories (archetypes) of people in this world: The
Faker, The Taker, The Baker and The Maker. Jung would most likely disagree with
my quantification (i.e., how many categories), but I’m sure he would agree with
the qualification of each (i.e., make up of the type).
The Faker
These are people who pretend to know what
they don’t know. These are people who use smoke and mirrors to get-by in
life and are always worried that if the illusion is not polished enough
they’ll be discovered for the fakes they really are. Fakers have all
kinds of strategies to disguise their insecurities behind a veil of
pretension. Fakers have no depth, they are purely one dimensional. Their
whole life is organized around maintaining the illusion and hoping no one
catches on.
How do you detect fakers? Look for
inconsistencies. For example, they claim to have a lot of money, but when
you look at what they wear, it’s not consistent. When they tell you how
well their doing but they show up to every networking event, you have to
ask yourself, if they were that successful, why are they still hustling
for new leads and contacts? To me, a dead giveaway is a website or wall
full of pictures with famous people. Why? It smacks of insecurity. It’s
no different than those who hang every degree or award they've ever
received on their walls. People who are well respected don’t need ornamental reminders of their
accomplishments. To successful people, awards are tokens of the
past. There's always a danger of getting stuck in the past; looking
backwards not forward.
For people with pictures alongside famous people,
here’s the real litmus test. If they’re that good, and that well
respected, shouldn’t the famous people have a picture of them on their
site or wall? Just a thought! Like in high school, hanging out with the
most popular kid just to be popular is not ‘success by association’, it’s
insecurity.
The Taker
These are people who always want something
for nothing. These are people who are always looking for a shortcut to
success at your expense. These are the same people who never want to pay
for anything and free is barely affordable. These are the people who will
call you up under the pretext of “I want to see how you’re doing” but in
reality what they really want is usually disguised and revealed towards
the tail end of a conversation. Nothing makes a Taker panic more then the
thought of you having to hang up before they’ve gotten what they’re
after. Takers will always ask you to share your information and insight
but are reluctant to reciprocate. Their weapons of obfuscation and deceit
are phrases like:
I’ll make it a point to send it to you or
email to you.
I don’t have it right now, but next we talk
I’ll give it to you.
I can’t remember off the top of my
head...I’ll get back to you.
I’ll find a way to pay you back.
Can I use (or borrow) that?
In most case they never follow-up or get
back to you. And, if they’re Sincere Takers (oxymoron here) they’ll say,
I really appreciate your willingness to
share.
In either of the cases above there is no
sense of appreciation or visible reciprocation. The only thing Takers
“don’t take” is the time to follow-up or thank you with some gesture of
appreciation. Takers take until they can’t take any more or they’ve taken
all they need…then they stop calling or coming around and move on to the
next victim.
The Baker
These are people who talk a great game but
never get into the game. These are people who are full of plans of
making it big, but in the end the only thing their full of is what you
find in a pasture of male cows. It’s said that a goal is a dream with a
deadline. Bakers never set a deadline. Their time horizon for getting
things done shifts into the distance with every excuse of why they can’t
get started. They’re the same people who’ll complain that society is
unfair and inequitable. Earl Nightengale, the great motivator, said that
success plays no favorites. In other words, success is available to any
willing to risk failure and simply get started.
Bakers are those people who every year you
hear them declare, “This is the year I’m going to do it!” but end up doing
nothing. They’ll ‘rationalize’ why they can’t get started. In my book,
The Logic of Success, I called this the ability to rationalize. If
you break up the word you see that it's the ability
to ‘Ration-lies” to oneself for not starting.
Bakers always have an
excuse of why they can’t start. Their main ingredient for life is
peppered with cant’s, won’ts, don’ts and a dash of tomorrow sauce for
flavor. Bakers will ‘bake’ their grand ideas for a very long time without
ever pulling it out of the mental oven into reality. Sadly enough, these
are the same people who will whisper with their last breath, “I
should’ve…” Too late! The oven timer of life just went off.
The Makers
Take the inverse of the top three (Faker,
Taker, Baker) and you have a Maker. Makers don’t rely on other people to
validate who they are. Their success is predicated on their own
accomplishments and not those of others. Makers have their own limelight
and never try to squeeze into the picture of someone else’s success.
Makers don’t take unless they can compensate the other party for what they
receive. Makers always seek to give more than they get. If they have to
pay for something, they do. For Makers the word FREE is suspect
whose cost may be too high in the long run by having too many strings
attached.
Makers are pay-as-you-go people who don’t
believe in shortcuts or taking advantage of others. They have an
ethical code of conduct that prohibits them from doing so. The philosopher Ayn
Rand referred to this code as a ‘value for value’ relationship whereby all
relationships, business or personal, should be judged on the bases of
giving value for value.
Makers don’t try to impress people with what
they’re going to do. They allow their accomplishments and actions to
speak on their behalf. When it comes to risks, Makers don’t seek
guarantees, they only seek opportunities to succeed. A Maker is
independent in every way and never dependent in any way.
So there you have it, my Jungian-like
archetypes: the Faker, Taker, Baker and Maker. When you're dealing with
people on a personal or business level, learn to identify who you're
dealing with. It may save you time, money and maybe even a little
heartache in the end.
Please share this article with a friend who may need a word of inspiration.
Copyright © 2007 by Victor Antonio All rights reserved. This article MAY
be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, as long as the author’s name, website and email
address are included as part of the article’s body. All inquiries,
including information on electronic licensing, should be directed to Victor Antonio.
|